If you're planning to buy a CPU, the best thing to do is to look for more than one review (at least 3) and build up a geomean in your mind, observing the relativity. This one seems more fair then articles like this in the past. Intel benefits on the lower end because of the E-cores. I am glad that there is a new thread here to post in. Maybe you heard about my complaints in another thread, one of which was that I could not not have any input as to what was wrong. Here is what I wrote, and for the article I cited I think it was pretty damning. As I said, this one appears more fair. Pricing continues to be an issue for AMD's Ryzen 7000. Intel's very aggressive pricing gives it the overall lead against AMD's competing Ryzen 7000 chips, even after AMD's recent unofficial price adjustments. That applies even more so if you're building a DDR4 system. AMD only supports DDR5 memory, so you won't have the option for lower-priced memory like you do with the Raptor Lake processors. DDR4-equipped motherboards also tend to be less expensive, too.

Intel Core i5-13600K 2023 - Windows Central Best motherboard for Intel Core i5-13600K 2023 - Windows Central

CPU Pricing and Value: Intel. No problems wit this. Though with the recent price cuts, It's probably a tie.So I went for DDR5, with "just" a Ryzen 5 7600X for the time being though - and I will eventually upgrade the CPU to possibly one with 3D V-Cache later. With Ryzen I do. Articles like this pop up fairly often, and I don't like the methodology. I'll go through it. Max Turbo Frequency refers to the maximum single-core processor frequency that can be achieved with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology. See www.intel.com/technology/turboboost/ for more information and applicability of this technology. Building a gaming rig is not always about getting the most expensive component; the majority of the time and for the majority of users budget is a big deal. If you still want to get amazing performance at a great price, then this is your choice. Get ready to fall in love with the MSI MAG Z690 Tomahawk WiFi; one of the best motherboards from the 690 generations. So this way you'll get more accurate results on how the CPU actually performs., narrowing the bias and other factors involved which could impact the accuracy of these benchmarks.

Intel Core i5-14600K - Review 2023 - PCMag UK Intel Core i5-14600K - Review 2023 - PCMag UK

The MSI MAG Z690 Tomahawk Wi-Fi uses a 16+1+1 configuration, with each 1 stage being for the GPU, the propagation of AUX, and the 16 phases for the CPU. Similar to the ASUS AORUX Z790 ELITE AX, the MSI MAG Z690 Tomahawk also has a 6-layer PCB with 2 ounces of copper, which is enough to put together a high-quality circuit board. Overall, the Core i5 shows excellent power consumption readings during our tests. It peaks at 471W during our Adobe Premiere test, which is the lowest of any of the CPUs we tested for comparison. Intel's Core i5 pulls slightly more power in the Cinebench test than the competing Ryzen 7 7700X, but it also performs slightly better in that test, which makes this a rather mixed result. The increased power draw has an effect, though — the 7700X and 7600X have a 105W TDP rating and a max power draw of 142W, the highest power consumption of the Ryzen 7 and 5 chips yet.It's also much higher than the previous-gen’s 65W TDP rating. The Ryzen chips are designed to use the full thermal headroom available to deliver more performance, so they can safely operate at 95C under heavy load. We don’t see that much with the Ryzen 7 and 5 models, though. Myself, I recently upgraded from a DDR3 rig, and went for DDR5. Which is not specifically needed for gaming (as even DDR3 still works). But from what I understand, DDR5 should work better with a many-cores CPU than DDR4 does. And my gaming time goes mostly on simulations, open-world games, and strategies, with use-cases such as modding Cities: Skylines to allow for more than 9 tiles to build in, where even 9 tiles can be quite demanding on hardware (possibly leading to lag, which has nothing to do with the GPU).Processors that support 64-bit computing on Intel® architecture require an Intel 64 architecture-enabled BIOS. The Core i5-13600K vs Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X battle ends in a five-to-three win in Intel's favor, though each of the Ryzen chips has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages in our different categories. AMD's Ryzen 7000 still holds the advantage in all power consumption metrics, including peak power and efficiency, resulting in more forgiving cooling requirements and a cooler and quieter system. However, AMD has increased its power consumption significantly with this generation, so the advantage isn't as pronounced as we've seen in the past.

Intel® Core™ i5-13600K Processor

Both Ryzen 7000 and Raptor Lake's modern connectivity technologies bring big increases in throughput via DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0 interfaces, but Intel also chose to continue to support DDR4 memory to offer a less-expensive path for builders. Meanwhile, AMD's decision to support only DDR5 has proven to be a pricing pain point. The Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X rivalry is a heated battle in the heart of gamer country — the mid-range price points — with Intel's 13th-Gen Raptor Lakex86 hybrid architecture squaring off against AMD's chiplet-based Zen 4 Ryzen 7000family. These two fundamentally different approaches have shaken up our list of the best CPUs for gaming as the Intel vs AMDbattle enters a new phase. Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics only: to use the Intel® Iris® Xe brand, the system must be populated with 128-bit (dual channel) memory. Otherwise, use the Intel® UHD brand.Intel's relative price increase with the Core i5-13600K is unwelcome. But we’ve run our tests and cannot deny that the Core i5-13600K still offers exceptional performance for what you pay. Sure, it isn't as fast as the Core i9-13900K or the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in CPU tests (those flagships have a big core-count advantage), but in games with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080—or anything weaker. really—it is more than a match for these two higher-end CPUs.

Intel Core i5-13600K UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X vs Intel Core i5-13600K

The Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X vs Core i5-13600K competition is close in single-threaded work, but the Core i5-13600K proves its mettle in multi-threaded work. It’s also notable that the Core i5-13600K has 24MB of L3 cache, 4MB more than the Core i5-12600K. That’s in addition to 20MB of L2 cache, which is slightly more than double the 9.5MB of L2 cache found on the Core i5-12600K. Despite the reduced pricing, the Ryzen chips face other challenges that come in the form of high memory and motherboard pricing. We dove in deep on those issues here. I think 3DCenter does the community a great service with these comparisons, and I encourage folks to reference them as a general indicator of what to expect. You can also use them to benchmark our benchmarks, as it were.Finally, the pricing advantage of DDR4 is simply too much to ignore, especially with lower-tier systems in this price range. While the premium for DDR5 has receded, you’ll still pay up to twice as much for a DDR5 kit as for DDR4, and AMD doesn't support the latter. For Raptor Lake, the slim performance advantage of DDR5 certainly doesn’t justify the extra price for DDR4, at least not for most users. Additionally, perhaps the best memory kit is the one you don’t have to buy — many upgraders likely already have a DDR4 kit, which is a plus.